Blog Sign In | Register
logo

THE HUMAN RIGHTS CENTRE UGANDA

Defending Human Rights Defenders


back

Consultant to review and update the human rights defenders training manual

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR CONSULTANCY

Organisational Background:

The Human Rights Centre Uganda (HRCU) is a non-profit, non-partisan and non-governmental organisation that was established in November 2008 with the main aim of contributing to the protection and promotion of the rights of human rights defenders in Uganda. It works towards improving the environment in which human rights defenders operate in Uganda. HRCU carries out its mandate nationally in Uganda through regional networks and coalitions. From the time of its formation, the Centre has had steady growth and registered success at different levels through three major focus areas namely capacity building for HRDs to understand their rights, responsibilities and the mechanisms available for their protection at national, regional and international level; research, documentation and reporting on the environment in which HRDs operate and; advocacy for an enabling operating environment for the work of HRDs in Uganda.  

In its efforts to equip civil society organisations and human rights defenders in Uganda with relevant skills to facilitate them in their work such as digital and physical safety skills , HRCU’s is seeking the services of a highly professional and experienced consultant to take lead in the review and in updating the HRCU’s human rights defenders training manual.

Purpose of the Training Manual

HRCUs human rights defenders training manual was developed in 2015. The manual was developed in response to increasing reports indicating that HRDs needed to enhance their capacity to investigate, monitor, document and advocate against human rights violations. The manual outlines a training of trainers’ workshop which aims at providing trainees with skills to equip others with the necessary tools for human rights education, investigation, monitoring and documentation of violations, advocacy, and security and safety. The manual has been designed for use by trainers and facilitators to prepare and conduct the workshops.

Due to new developments in the context and continuous assessment of the needs of HRDs, there is need to update the modules for example on safety, and security. The manual will be updated and printed in the first quarter of implementation and used in the training of CSO members and HRDs in the selected districts particularly on safety and security skills to address the ever changing times currently faced by HRDs and CSOs in Uganda.

Overall Objective

To review and update the current HRCU’s human rights defenders training manual published in 2015

Specific Tasks

In close collaboration with the HRCU, the consultant will undertake the following activities:

  1. Prepare a detailed inception report articulating the understanding of TOR, proposed methodology and work plan for undertaking the consultancy
  2. Prepare an analysis report outlining the current short-comings in the manual. Methodology for developing such report should involve review of current manual and other relevant reference documents, meetings with the HRCU programmes department and other key stakeholders. This process should also involve desk review and interviews with selected human rights defenders focal persons in various regions
  3. Hold a review meeting with critical stakeholders such as human rights defenders and CSOs who are the beneficiaries of the training as part of reviewing the current manual and identify areas requiring major changes and incorporate inputs
  4. Finalize the manual and submit both soft and hard copy to HRCU

Expected deliverables

Activity

Deliverables

Timeframe

Prepare a detailed inception report articulating your understanding of TOR, proposed methodology and work plan for undertaking the assignment

A detailed inception report that outlines, methodology, and work plan for undertaking the assignment

5 days

Prepare an analysis report outlining the current short-comings in the manual

Analysis completed and report submitted.

5 days

Hold a review meeting with critical stakeholders and identify areas requiring major changes and incorporate inputs

Review meetings held and areas requiring major changes identified.

5 days

Finalise the manual and submit both soft and hard copy to HRCU

Manual finalized and submitted

5 days

 

Total duration

21 days

Reporting

The consultant will work closely with the HRCU Programmes Department. Formal supervisor will be the senior programme Officer Research and Training.

Skills and Competencies

  1. Degree in law, human rights,  governance or other relevant field
  2. Minimum of 10 years’ experience with focus on human rights law, research, advocacy or other related fields
  3. Excellent understanding and experience in human rights  and human rights defenders
  4. Experience in planning and designing participatory meetings and trainings with engaging facilitation methods and activities
  5. Excellent process planning, organizing and facilitation skills including in relation to development of manuals
  6. Extensive experience in developing manuals, analysis and report writing
  7. Excellent writing and presentation skills and excellent command of the English language

General conditions

  1. HRCU  will not provide any material or logistics support not provided in the contract agreement
  2. The consultant will not be entitled to payment of overtime. All remuneration must be within the contract agreement
  3. Payments will be based on the successful completion of deliverables
  4. Under the consultancy agreement, a month is defined as 21 working days. Consultants are not paid for weekends or public holidays

Other Key Information:

Timeline: It is expected that the work will start shortly after the signing of the contract.

Location: Kampala, Uganda

Interested individuals should submit a cover letter, comprehensive curriculum vitae including three contactable references and technical and financial proposal to: hrcug@hrcug.org and c/c to snalukwago@hrcug.org

Deadline for this application is 08th March 2018

Only shortlisted candidates will be contacted.

HRCU is an equal opportunity employer



 
   Print Friendly and PDF

Blog

  • By: sckawooya
    Parliament’s role in promoting Constitutionalism: Constitutionalism is the idea that a government can and should be limited in its powers by a fundamental law or set of laws, beyond the reach of an individual government to amend them; whose authority depends on its observing of these limitations. The Constitution of the Republic of Uganda, 1995 as amended provides for a system of checks and balances amongst the 3 arms of government: Executive, Legislature and Judiciary. These three arms of government are each charged with specific duties. The Executive is charged with the duty to implement and maintain the Constitution and laws made under the Constitution; the Legislature is charged with the duty of formulating laws for the Country, which should be in conformity with the Constitution. Parliament is also charged with the duty to protect the Constitution and promote the democratic governance of Uganda; the Judiciary is the justice dispensing arm of government. Parliament is the legislative, elected body of government tasked with passing laws of Uganda that provide for good governance and playing the oversight role of the other arms of government. Parliament is thus the representation of the people. Parliament is principally charged with 2 roles in promoting constitutionalism. These have been enshrined in the 1995 Constitution of the Republic of Uganda; protecting the Constitution and holding the Executive accountable. Protecting the Constitution In order to appreciate this duty imposed on Parliament, Uganda’s history with regard to the constitutions had and the making of the 1995 Constitution should be noted. Benjamin J. Odoki, in his essay, “The Challenges of Constitution-making and Implementation in Uganda” he noted that the making of a new constitution in Uganda demonstrated the desire of the people to fundamentally change their system of governance into a truly democratic one. Further that the process was thus a major step towards the democratization of the country which had experienced nearly thirty years of oppression, tyranny and exploitation. The history of Uganda’s constitutionalism road is that up until 1995, Uganda had had 3 constitutions namely: 1962, 1966 and 1967 Constitutions. It should be noted that in making of these constitutions, massive consultations of the citizens was not done by the responsible authorities. They had simply been enacted, and handed down to be implemented. It could thus be argued that the views of the people had not been reflected in the Constitutions. Thus, in 1988, the Uganda Constitution Commission was established and it spearheaded the task of making the Constitution that was promulgated in 1995 by the Constituent assembly. The making of the Constitution was distinctly characterized by popular participation by the people which was achieved through wide consultation and national public debate. The Constitution under Article 79 lays down the functions of Parliament which are to make laws and protect the constitution and promote democratic governance of Uganda. The duty of protecting the constitution would among others include preserving the spirit of the constitution that way it is not amended or altered veering off the purpose of the people. Since 1995, the constitution has been amended a number of times; including September and December 2005. The amendments have among others been for the creation of new districts, new offices, creation of special courts to handle offences relating to corruption, remove the limits on the tenure of office of the President. The role of parliament in protecting the constitution must be to vote either for or against an amendment of the constitution whilst being mindful of the Uganda’s history. Parliament should also be mindful of the fact that the constitution that was promulgated in 1995 was one that reflected the views of the people who had lived through the oppression and tyranny that characterizes our past as a nation. Parliament is further urged to not only look at the present and past but also the future. Ideally, the test should be that if an amendment years down the road can easily lead to oppression or tyranny stands to be exploited to the detriment of Uganda and her citizens, that amendment should not be allowed. As earlier noted, Constitutionalism is about ensuring that governance is done in accordance with the law and not the whim of the government of the day. Similarly, the constitution should not be easily and frequently amended to suit the needs of the government of the day. And this is what in principle the duty of protecting the constitution is all about. Holding the Executive accountable As noted earlier, each arm of government has certain controls over the other 2 arms. For Parliament, it principally has the duty of holding the Executive or the state accountable for all decisions that it makes as well as its actions. This is provided for under the national objective I which makes it clear that the President has to report to Parliament and the nation all steps taken to ensure the realization of the national objectives and directive principles of state policy. The goal of holding the Executive accountable is such that there is difficulty in the State abusing the power that it is given by law. Parliament, in fulfilling this duty has held weekly plenary sessions in which the Prime Minister is tasked to explain state actions of lack thereof on issues, and through the parliamentary committee sessions, has held the state accountable. The expectation for the 10th Parliament is that it does not take the trend of the 9th Parliament, which during its first year was seen to be assertive and its actions promoting constitutionalism and over the course of time became less active with the fire unfortunately dying out. Members of Parliament should at all times be mindful of Parliament’s role in promoting constitutionalism and in all decisions have them at the forefront as they are the key in protecting Uganda from ever experiencing the past that we have worked so hard to distance ourselves from.

  • By: mutawai
    Right to be employed: Dr Stella Nyanzi OF MISR undressed after she was locked out of her office. As human rights defenders how do we take this issue on and advise? We need to take on peace and conflict resolution as a focus area because not all situations require extreme measures.

  • By: kjose
    HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDERS SUBMIT JOINT REPORTS TO THE 26TH SESSION OF UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW WORKING: The Universal Periodic Review (UPR) is a unique mechanism of the Human Rights Council (HRC) aimed at improving the human rights situation on the ground of each of the 193 United Nations (UN) Member States. Under this mechanism, the human rights situation of all UN Member States is reviewed every 4.5 years. 42 States are reviewed each year during three Working Group sessions dedicated to 14 States each. These three sessions are usually held in January/February, May/June and October/November. The result of each review is reflected in an “outcome report” listing the recommendations the State under review (SuR) will have to implement before the next review. The UPR is a full-circle process comprised of 3 key stages: 1) Review of the human rights situation of the SuR; 2) Implementation between two reviews (4.5 years) by the SuR of the recommendations received and the voluntary pledges made; 3) Reporting at the next review on the implementation of those recommendations and pledges and on the human rights situation in the country since the previous review. The process provides for the participation of all relevant stakeholders, including non-governmental organisations and national human rights institutions (NHRIs). Civil society actors and NHRIs can submit information which can be added to the “other stakeholders” report to be considered during the review. For the 26th Session of the UPR Working Group, Civil society actors submitted joint reports for the UPRs of Uganda. https://www.defenddefenders.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/NCHRD-U-UPR-Uganda-Cluster-Report-2016.pdf

  • By: hrcug
    The Anna Lindh lecture 2014: Ms Margaret Sekaggya guest speaker at the Anna Lindh lecture 2014 organized by @lunduniversity and @RWallenbergInst http://bit.ly/1w8qgsO

Follow Us:
facebook google+ YouTube twitter linkedln

Resources